The Screening of microRNAs in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Clinical Evaluation.

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a type of leukemia whose main genetic marker is the reciprocal translocation that leads to the production of the BCR::ABL1 oncoprotein. The expression of some genes may interfere with the progression and development of leukemias. MicroRNAs are small non-coding RNAs that have the potential to alter the expression of some genes and may be correlated with some types of leukemia and could be used as biomarkers in the diagnosis and prognosis of patients. Therefore, this project carried out an analysis of microRNA-type plasma biomarkers in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia at unique points, including follow-up analysis of patients from the Erasto Gaertner Hospital. 35 microRNAs were analyzed in different cohorts. Inside those groups, 70 samples were analyzed at unique points and 11 patients in a follow-up analysis. Statistically different results were found for microRNA-7-5p, which was found to be upregulated in patients with high expression of the BCR::ABL1 transcript when compared to healthy controls. This microRNA also had evidence of behavior related to BCR::ABL1 when analyzed in follow-up, but strong evidence was not found. In this way, this work obtained results that may lead to manifestations of a relationship between miR-7-5p and chronic myeloid leukemia, and evaluations of possible microRNAs that are not related to this pathology.

Molecular BCR::ABL1 Quantification and ABL1 Mutation Detection as Essential Tools for the Clinical Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients: Results from a Brazilian Single-Center Study.

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a well-characterized oncological disease in which virtually all patients possess a translocation (9;22) that generates the tyrosine kinase BCR::ABL1 protein. This translocation represents one of the milestones in molecular oncology in terms of both diagnostic and prognostic evaluations. The molecular detection of the BCR::ABL1 transcription is a required factor for CML diagnosis, and its molecular quantification is essential for assessing treatment options and clinical approaches. In the CML molecular context, point mutations on the ABL1 gene are also a challenge for clinical guidelines because several mutations are responsible for tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance, indicating that a change may be necessary in the treatment protocol. So far, the European LeukemiaNet and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) have presented international guidelines on CML molecular approaches, especially those related to BCR::ABL1 expression. In this study, we show almost three years' worth of data regarding the clinical treatment of CML patients at the Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil. These data primarily comprise 155 patients and 532 clinical samples. BCR::ABL1 quantification by a duplex-one-step RT-qPCR and ABL1 mutations detection were conducted. Furthermore, digital PCR for both BCR::ABL1 expression and ABL1 mutations were conducted in a sub-cohort. This manuscript describes and discusses the clinical importance and relevance of molecular biology testing in Brazilian CML patients, demonstrating its cost-effectiveness.

Pevonedistat plus azacitidine vs azacitidine alone in higher-risk MDS/chronic myelomonocytic leukemia or low-blast-percentage AML.

PANTHER is a global, randomized phase 3 trial of pevonedistat+azacitidine (n = 227) vs azacitidine monotherapy (n = 227) in patients with newly diagnosed higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS; n = 324), higher-risk chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (n = 27), or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with 20% to 30% blasts (n = 103). The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS). In the intent-to-treat population, the median EFS was 17.7 months with pevonedistat+azacitidine vs 15.7 months with azacitidine (hazard ratio [HR], 0.968; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.757-1.238; P = .557) and in the higher-risk MDS cohort, median EFS was 19.2 vs 15.6 months (HR, 0.887; 95% CI, 0.659-1.193; P = .431). Median overall survival (OS) in the higher-risk MDS cohort was 21.6 vs 17.5 months (HR, 0.785; P = .092), and in patients with AML with 20% to 30% blasts was 14.5 vs 14.7 months (HR, 1.107; P = .664). In a post hoc analysis, median OS in the higher-risk MDS cohort for patients receiving >3 cycles was 23.8 vs 20.6 months (P = .021) and for >6 cycles was 27.1 vs 22.5 months (P = .008). No new safety signals were identified, and the azacitidine dose intensity was maintained. Common hematologic grade ≥3 treatment emergent adverse events were anemia (33% vs 34%), neutropenia (31% vs 33%), and thrombocytopenia (30% vs 30%). These results underscore the importance of large, randomized controlled trials in these heterogeneous myeloid diseases and the value of continuing therapy for >3 cycles. The trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03268954.

Fluorescent and colorimetric RT-LAMP as a rapid and specific qualitative method for chronic myeloid leukemia diagnosis.

The detection of BCR-ABL1 mRNA transcripts is essential to molecular chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) diagnosis. In most cases, the RT-qPCR technique is performed as the gold standard diagnosis tool for clinical cases. However, this method requires expensive reagents and equipment, such as a real-time thermal cycler, probes and master mix. Consequently, the development and validation of simple and low-cost methods are essential for a rapid CML diagnosis in less specialized and equipped centers. In this study, we develop and demonstrate an accessible, rapid, and low-cost method using RT-LAMP for BCR-ABL1 detection in both cell lines and CML clinical samples, using fluorescent and colorimetric assays. Both methods demonstrated diagnostic specificity of 100% and while diagnostic sensitivity reaches more than 90% in samples with RT-qPCR cycle threshold above 31. The obtained data indicates that the proposed method here described is robust, specific and rapid approach for CML diagnosis with outstanding performance, especially for CML diagnostic procedure where present high BCR-ABL1 expression.

Doenças hepatobiliares eosinofílicas: relato de dois casos e revisão de literatura / Eosinophilic hepatobiliary diseases: a report of two cases and literature review

As doenças hepatobiliares eosinofílicas são patologias raras de origem e de fatores etiológicos ainda não esclarecidos, sendo muitas vezes relacionadas à gastroenterite eosinofílica ou síndrome hipereosinofílica. Caracterizam-se por infiltração de eosinófilos em tecidos hepatobiliares e podem estar associadas à eosinofilia periférica na ausência de outras causas de eosinofilia. A raridade e conhecimento incompleto dessas doenças refletem na dificuldade de diagnóstico e de escolha terapêutica. O diagnóstico é feito através da exclusão de outras causas de eosinofilia periférica, tais como parasitoses, reações medicamentosas e doenças malignas, e também por análise histopatológica do tecido infiltrado. A maioria dos casos é responsiva ao tratamento com corticosteroides. Descrevemos dois casos clínicos, um de colecistite eosinofílica e outro de hepatite eosinofílica, avaliando, segundo revisão de literatura, a possibilidade de uma gastroenterite eosinofílica ou de uma síndrome hipereosinofílica em ambos os casos.

The eosinophilic hepatobiliary diseases are rare pathologies of origin and etiologic factors not yet clarified, being many times related to eosinophilic gastroenteritis or hipereosinophilic syndrome. They are characterized by an infiltration of eosinophils in hepatobiliary tissues and can be associated to peripheral eosinophilia, in the absence of other eosinophilia causes. The rareness and incomplete knowledge about these diseases reflect on the difficulty of diagnosis and choice of treatment. The diagnosis is made through exclusion of other causes of peripheral eosinofilia, such as parasitosis, drug reactions and malignant diseases, and also through histopathological analysis of the infiltrated tissue. Most cases respond to treatment with corticosteroids. We reported two cases, one of eosinophilic colecistitis and other of eosinophilic hepatitis, evaluating, according to literature review, the possibility of eosinophilic gastroenteritis or hipereosinophilic syndrome in both cases.

Clinical assessment of oral mucositis and candidiasis compare to chemotherapic nadir in transplanted patients.

Oral mucositis is a chief complication in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). It is considered a toxic inflammatory reaction that interferes with the patient's recuperation and quality of life. Oral candidiasis is a common fungal infection observed in dental practice, particularly in immunocompromised patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of oral mucositis and oral candidiasis in patients who underwent HSCT and their correlation with the chemotherapeutic nadir (lowest possible outcome). We evaluated patients with different diagnoses who underwent HSCT at the Hospital Erasto Gaertner. No chemotherapeutic nadir curves could be associated with mucositis, and patients had different presentations of mucositis. No patient developed oral candidiasis during hospitalization. Together with cell counts, we collected demographic data including age, oral hygiene, habits harmful to health, and the use of oral prostheses. It was observed that patients who smoked cigarettes before hospitalization showed less mucositis, resulting in no feeding problems or other comorbid conditions due to the effect of mucositis. However, the nadir of the chemotherapy curve, in isolation, is not a predictive tool for the appearance (or no appearance) of oral mucositis.